They also needed to learn how to control their emotions. Plato, being a student of the famous Socrates, reinstates the question that Socrates tried to put forth by asking what justice really is. It is actually an injustice to assume that only intellectual people are rulers. Socrates decides that the best way to go about this is by first finding justice at a political level in a city and then finding the analogous justice in a man.
It is a choice to live Plato a reaction paper justly or unjustly. The arguments that were posed seem somewhat vague and they tend to go back and forth from one conclusion to another.
If they had a courageous state of mind, it would enable to them to act courageously. Adeimantus speaks of a society that needs no guardianship. They would see him as impaired by his journey. Plato believed this to be true for both men and women. A person that had a soul full of spirit was believed to be in a class of warriors.
Their wealth is of the mind. He talks about people that are well taught and self-disciplined. In this situation, he believed that bad forces ruled these people and therefore they had no control over themselves and their behaviors.
The reader has three classifications to choose from which each rival each other in their own way. It is the response received after performing a certain action, which enables a person to call themselves good.
He found that he could not do this and therefore he placed justice, as a virtue, in all three categories. People who are not bakers are capable of baking bread yet the baker is the best at performing this specific task.
He thought that if he learned why each individual fell into a particular category of souls that it would be easier to govern them. I think that a true philosopher would be a great rule because the philosophers learn to look at things from multiple angles, in an objective manner, so I think that such a ruler would not be self-motivated in their actions and would act fairly and justly to represent all the citizens.
However, if they perform an action that pleases society they are considered virtuous and good. However, one argument that we continue to see is that not all things that are just are good. In terms of desire, Plato believed that this soul belonged to the commoners and that their virtue was temperance.
Plato argues that perceptions of material objects are imperfect reflections of an unchanging form of truth that can be pursued through the quest for knowledge and belief. Each person will behave how they choose and although outside factors may influence certain behaviors, it is who they are that will determine how they react to those outside influences.
According to Plato, souls that were filled with reason found an interest in knowledge. This defines for the readers that learning and knowledge is a slow progression that leads to the truth by demystifying the shadows of imperfect objects, classifying truth as the greatest enlightenment and righteousness available.
University of New York Press, Although there are certain jobs that must be performed by each individual within a community, not everyone is going to perform the functions that they are supposed to do.
People who were courageous were the guardians of the city, acting as an army or police force.
We are also forced to choose between the differences in societies and make choices between them as well. People who wished to fulfill their desires must learn to use reason in order to act upon that just behavior.
This means that a person could perform a courageous or intellectual act without necessarily being courageous or intellectual. Plato further goes on to say a person cannot choose an answer that is just unless they are first willing to understand exactly what justice is.
Therefore, people that behaved immorally were not happy and if they wanted to be happy, they would strive to be just.Reaction Paper: Plato Summary: Plato, in The Republic writes about a dialogue between Socrates and other fellow philosophers about what is just and what is not.
They begin to construct what the definition is and refute some definitions because they have fatal flaws. Plato - A reaction paper Plato is regarded as one of the greatest philosophers of all time because his thinking still influences contemporary thoughts.
Unlike other authors who vanished in history as a result of the introduction of more progressive scholars, modern authors have built upon the ideas of Plato to come up with their own philosophies.
Response Paper #2- Allegory of the Cave Posted on September 19, by Alisa Rudy In Book Seven of The Republic, Plato presents his famous “Allegory of the Cave”. Socrates decides that the best way to go about this is by first finding justice at a political level in a city and then finding the analogous justice in a man.
This is where Plato’s motive for writing the dialogue comes in and Socrates. Plato argues that perceptions of material objects are imperfect reflections of an unchanging form of truth that can be pursued through the quest for knowledge and belief.
We will write a custom essay sample on Allegory of the Cave Reaction Paper or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER He [ ]. The Allegory of the Cave (Reflection Paper) 1.
Domingo, Dennimar O. 2nd year - BSBA Marketing Management Philosophy of Man / MWF / Professor Noel Ybañez November 29, The Allegory of the Cave By: Plato The creativity of Plato, along with his deep understanding of human nature, compels him to create a scenario .Download