Societies prioritize these two existential goals differently. Societies who score low on this dimension, for example, prefer to maintain time-honoured traditions and norms while viewing societal change with suspicion. In these countries emphasis tended to be placed upon winning and success.
Masculinity and Femininity Hofstede used the terms masculinity and femininity to describe specific sets of traits that might be considered predominately masculine or feminine. Masculine traits might include assertion, acquisition and even aggression. Those with a culture which scores high, on the other hand, take a more pragmatic approach: Countries with highly feminine cultures included Sweden, Norway and the Netherlands.
The United States and Europe are no exception in this respect. To this end they have provided direction. Hardly the behavior of a creative, independently-minded people!
The outcome however can be an acquisitive, undiscerning and uncreative society in which everyone wants the same things and, as a consequence, develop similar patterns of thinking.
Those best able to cope with uncertainty and ambiguity included Singapore followed by Jamaica and Denmark. The fundamental issue here is how a society handles inequalities among people.
In the academic environment, the terminology Monumentalism versus Flexhumility is sometimes also used. Restraint stands for a society that suppresses gratification of needs and regulates it by means of strict social norms.
Demonstrators orchestrated street protests and committed acts of wanton vandalism designed to draw attention to measures that would cause environmental damage.
Countries least able to cope with uncertainty and ambiguity included; Greece, Portugal and Japan. The six dimensions of national culture are based on extensive research done by Professor Geert Hofstede, Gert Jan Hofstede, Michael Minkov and their research teams.
Its opposite, Femininity, stands for a preference for cooperation, modesty, caring for the weak and quality of life. To get a media kit and information on advertising or sponsoring click here. The data covered more than 70 countries, from which Hofstede first used the 40 countries with the largest groups of respondents and afterwards extended the analysis to 50 countries and 3 regions.
Material acquisition is perhaps the easiest and surest way of attaining status. Contact us anonymously through this link. According to Hofstede such cultures also have the potential to stimulate innovation as they maintain a greater level of tolerance towards unorthodox ideas and concepts.
Singapore has had less than forty years to both develop a sense of cultural identity and to achieve economic transformation. Countries identified as being highly masculine included Japan and Austria.
Weak UAI societies maintain a more relaxed attitude in which practice counts more than principles. Individualism v collectivism Refers to the extent to which individual or group identity is promoted within that country.
The author was not remunerated for this article.
In cultures where there is a high acceptance of inequality a more autocratic style of management might be preferred and where there is a low acceptance of inequality a more democratic style might be appropriate.
Uncertainty avoidance Refers to the extent to which members of a society area able to cope with uncertainty and ambiguity. One of the features of the kiasu syndrome is that people tend to go after the same things. Singapore was rated as being midway, in other words not particularly masculine or feminine.
Anti-social behavior perhaps but, none the less, designed to bring to light a greater transgression. In societies with low Power Distance, people strive to equalise the distribution of power and demand justification for inequalities of power.
Countries with a high acceptance of power inequality included Malaysia and the Philippines. So how does this tie in with first hand experience of Singaporean national culture? Conversely countries with a high group orientation included; most of the Asian countries including; Singapore, Taiwan, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Thailand and the Philippines.
The underlying reasoning is that if so many want it, it must be a good thing. The centrality of materialism within a society is usually culturally derived.
Masculinity v Femininity Power distance Refers to the extent to which an unequal distribution of power is accepted by members of that society. Not surprisingly, given such a relatively short time scale, the priority of government has been to get things done.
The fundamental issue here is how a society deals with the fact that the future can never be known: The model consists of the following dimensions:In Dutch anthropologist, Geert Hofstede (1) conducted a study of national culture in which he surveyedIBM employees located in forty different countries.
The purpose was to identify and to distinguish the cultural features of different countries. As defined by Wikipedia, scoring low on the "Hofstede's uncertainty avoidance" indicates a a society's willingness to accept ambiguity.
This is true Singapore would very well score quite low on it. According to socio-cultural analysis using by Geert Hofstede five cultural dimension model, furniture products made of teak are decided to market Singapore.
These products are manufactured by Myanmar Teak Company limited is using precious teaks from Myanmar. For example, Germany has a 35 on the cultural scale of Hofstede’s analysis.
Compared to Arab countries where the power distance is very high (80) and Austria where it very low (11), Germany is. Compare countries Discover the Culture compass survey Measure your personal cultural preferences on Hofstede’s 6D model, compare them to the culture of a selected.
Argentina-Geert Hofstede™ Cultural Dimensions. Geert Hofstede™ Cultural Dimensions * Description for each of Hofstede's Dimensions listed below Argentina is similar to many of the Latin American countries in analysis of the Hofstede Dimensions (see Latin America Hofstede Graph below).
The high Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI) ranking of 86 indicates the society’s low level of tolerance for uncertainty.Download